stormdog: (Kira)
An article from Citylab about how hard it is to get rid of our cars on an emotional level rings true for me. I have felt significant emotional attachment to my cars through time. I still miss them to varying degrees. I don't think I was ever in a position to be spending on them unreasonably, especially with Super Mechanic Juan around to help me out. But the below quotation from the article is very telling, and I can see how easily it could happen.

"Even when our car is in crappy shape, the emotional attachment we have to it can trump material demands."

It may help in my own willingness to get rid of my own car that I anthropomorphize my bikes, Longing and Perseverance, in the same ways. Plus, I've gone through enough cars (I'm on my seventh, meaning I average only two years or so with a given vehicle, though having only owned my Aveo for three months skews that a bit) that the process of loss has become somewhat routinized.

Still, In fact, I've been attached enough to my motor vehicles that I have a photo album of them.
stormdog: (floyd)
A couple interesting pieces of writing on being a pedestrian.

First, a short history of how 'jaywalking' became a crime. Can you imagine what moving through a city or town was like when cars were that which was out of place on a street? When it was a motorist's responsibility to avoid pedestrians? From Vox Magainze, "The forgotten history of how automakers invented the crime of "jaywalking"
http://www.vox.com/2015/1/15/7551873/jaywalking-history

Second, an interesting piece of science-fiction that I found when looking through UW-Parkside's collection of vintage sci-fi pulp magazines. In Amazing Stories, I found this oddly relevant tale of a world where being a pedestrian is illegal. The author writes of the far future, when certain roads had actually been made illegal for pedestrian use, and where people seem to be perpetually driving just to go somewhere, anywhere. Where those who walk are seen as throwbacks to a primitive past.

David Keller's "Revolt of the Pedestrians" was written back in 1928, when automobiles were becoming more and more a part of everyday life. Right in the middle, in fact, of the campaign being waged by auto-makers against pedestrians that the Vox article describes. It begins on page 1048 (the pages were sequentially numbered between issues) of the magazine.
https://archive.org/details/AmazingStoriesVolume02Number11

One of the things that fascinates me about this is the political views that inform these feelings about cars. Wikipedia tells me that Keller is known is a conservative writer. In the present day, this kind of anti-car attitude might be seen as radically progressive. In 1928 though, it would probably have characterized as conservative, and even reactionary. A new paradigm of movement through the city was rising to replace an old one, and Keller was railing against it with his imagined world where motorists run down and kill pedestrians with impunity.

It's amazing how the same political position can mean very different things, and be related to a very different set of *other* political positions, depending on the time and place it occupies.
stormdog: (Geek)
I've finally gotten myself to do something productive today. I caught up on and reconciled my bank account for December and January. It got away from me a little bit over the holidays. At the same time, I updated my car expenses spreadsheet. I'm really interested in what the actual operating and ownership costs of my vehicles, both petrochemical-fueled and human-powered, are.

I bought my 1999 Lumina in July of 2013 for $200. Repairs and registration ran another $728.35. Since then, I've driven about 12,138 miles, and spent a total of about $4,970 on the car. Altogether, it comes out to about forty cents per mile. That includes the $400 I spent on tires, and the $867 for a new fuel pump and gas tank. I'm still under the AAA estimated 60.8 cents per mile, even though that last repair was a big bite out of my finances.

I'm averaging about 20mpg, though it swings up and down from that point a surprising amount. (I *really* miss my 45-48mpg Swift. This is *not* my ideal car.) At that price, my Oklahoma trip will cost about $140 in gas, at $2 per gallon. However, in total operating costs, it will come out to about $560. That's a *big* hidden cost, isn't it? It should be a little bit lower due to all the highway driving, but still. Cars are expensive things to own, and rather sneaky about it to boot! (Updated with corrected math. Oops!)

Still hoping I can live without a car when I move for grad school.

*sighs* In my Swift, I could have done this for about $60 in gas. It was about a 12 gallon tank and I could get over 750 miles on it.

Someday, I'll have a car like that again.

Profile

stormdog: a woman with light skin and long brown hair that cascades over one shoulder. On her other side, she is holding a large plush shark against herself. She has pink fingernails and pink cat eye glasses (Default)
MeghanIsMe

January 2025

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 22nd, 2025 05:38 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios